Yes. Try getting someone who isn't a sexworker to recognise that though. Money takes the place of consent. With no money, there is no consent. Who's the fool turning tricks without getting the money first, though? Perhaps they're a 'trusted' client who rips them off, I got done for $100 that way last week. I did get the other $550 out of him first, though, and I justified it by reasoning he'd brought champagne. It's lying to myself as he's an otherwise good client who spends much but often short changes me $50 or so. There's no sex, he just likes me fisting him. Next time I might just not cut my nails before he arrives and accidentally spike him once or twice. Grr to him!
By letting him shortchange you often, you set a precendent.
But if you feel reasonably alright with what you do profit, no harm.
I'd like to know how that's *not* rape. This statement confuses me...especially if the shortchanging is recurring (assuming that is what you were referring to)
Because you either consent or you don't. If you say 'stop' in the middle of sex, it must be respected, but that doesn't make the sex before you say 'stop' non-consensual. So saying 'no' after the event is too late.
Consent can't be conditional and the cure is so simple - get the money first!
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Money takes the place of consent. With no money, there is no consent. Who's the fool turning tricks without getting the money first, though? Perhaps they're a 'trusted' client who rips them off, I got done for $100 that way last week. I did get the other $550 out of him first, though, and I justified it by reasoning he'd brought champagne. It's lying to myself as he's an otherwise good client who spends much but often short changes me $50 or so. There's no sex, he just likes me fisting him. Next time I might just not cut my nails before he arrives and accidentally spike him once or twice. Grr to him!
I'd like to know how that's *not* rape.
no subject
But if you feel reasonably alright with what you do profit, no harm.
I'd like to know how that's *not* rape. This statement confuses me...especially if the shortchanging is recurring (assuming that is what you were referring to)
no subject
no subject
no subject
Consent can't be conditional and the cure is so simple - get the money first!
http://www.sw5.info/rape.htm