![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
In reverse order :)
Jun. 11th, 2003 12:54 pmWell, it is the most time sensitive one. ( So Ian, what did you think of The Hanging Man, the latest show from Improbable? )
Jun. 11th, 2003
(no subject)
Jun. 11th, 2003 09:20 pmHello friendly lawyers... Not for the first time, the behaviour of Manchester United has made me wonder. David Beckham has a contract with them for two or three years, yet they've anounced that they want to sell him to Barcelona... without apparently asking him first.
Presumably he can say 'get lost, we have a contract, pay my wages for the next two or three years'?
Could he successfully claim constructive dismissal? If he were out of contract, he'd be able to make more money and they'd be left with no transfer fee.
One of the reasons for ManU picking Barcelona is that they are not a club they are likely to face in the European Cup, unlike eg Real Madrid. Presumably if they tried to include a clause in the sale that said 'you can't sell him onto Real Madrid', it'd be declared an unlawful restraint of trade?
Presumably he can say 'get lost, we have a contract, pay my wages for the next two or three years'?
Could he successfully claim constructive dismissal? If he were out of contract, he'd be able to make more money and they'd be left with no transfer fee.
One of the reasons for ManU picking Barcelona is that they are not a club they are likely to face in the European Cup, unlike eg Real Madrid. Presumably if they tried to include a clause in the sale that said 'you can't sell him onto Real Madrid', it'd be declared an unlawful restraint of trade?
