And yet the paper cites arguments that it was originally wrong, and the basic thrust about marital consent has been totally undermined by recent developments. It doesn't sound like a clear legal situation to me. It sounds more like a precedent just waiting to be overturned.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
baggyeyes
(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-06 11:38 am (UTC)