Ian (
lovingboth) wrote2002-12-05 07:06 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
Anyone a member of Unison?
It's the union that's recognised at work, and there's part of me that's tempted to join although not for any benefits there. It's a sufficiently small organisation that we don't actually need it. But there are other benefits.
And of course, Unison has a Lesbian and Gay Campaign. But when they say 'Lesbian and Gay' they mean Lesbian and Gay.
To give you an idea of just how biphobic the L&G campaign is, when they're reporting on who attended something they break it down into age, racial identity, earnings etc and gender. That's as in "12 lesbians 10 gay men" gender.
It was women from Unison's L&G campaign who drove several other women to tears when they insisted at an ILGA (International Lesbian & Gay Association - to change the name needs a constitutional amendment which needs almost 100% support) meeting that women's caucus meant, necessarily, a lesbian-only one.
Now, I have the sense of humour that means I can laugh at this sort of crap - not least because they just hate that - but tempting as it is to join the L&G campaign and kick up a fuss... it would be good to have a Unison Bisexual Campaign.
I suspect that would need more than one person though :) (Mind you, the L&G campaign doesn't seem to have that many activists.)
Edit: gosh, how they changed over the next few years.
And of course, Unison has a Lesbian and Gay Campaign. But when they say 'Lesbian and Gay' they mean Lesbian and Gay.
To give you an idea of just how biphobic the L&G campaign is, when they're reporting on who attended something they break it down into age, racial identity, earnings etc and gender. That's as in "12 lesbians 10 gay men" gender.
It was women from Unison's L&G campaign who drove several other women to tears when they insisted at an ILGA (International Lesbian & Gay Association - to change the name needs a constitutional amendment which needs almost 100% support) meeting that women's caucus meant, necessarily, a lesbian-only one.
Now, I have the sense of humour that means I can laugh at this sort of crap - not least because they just hate that - but tempting as it is to join the L&G campaign and kick up a fuss... it would be good to have a Unison Bisexual Campaign.
I suspect that would need more than one person though :) (Mind you, the L&G campaign doesn't seem to have that many activists.)
Edit: gosh, how they changed over the next few years.
no subject
Rough stuff, dude.
no subject
The Lesbian and Gay side looks like it could do with a bit of a shakeup - and it's a lot easier to effect change from the inside than from the outside.
no subject
And the probable end result would be them splitting off to have a nice pure "lesbian only no transsexuals no bisexuals no SM supporters" campaign. Whether or not that would be welcomed by the rest of the members, I don't know.
no subject
no subject
well...
However, persitently buggering up my application form I eventually gave up.
I have persued AEEU-Amicus now (cos of the Tech links)
But they werent great in my area for checking up on their members...
but could always be good should trouble arise along things of health and safety etc etc.
Re: well...
no subject
no subject
if i do join a union, i suppose i could maybe join the IUSW, since you don't have to be a sex worker to join it and my job is at least quite related. i don't know much about unions in general, though. but, you have only one that's recognised at your work?!
no subject
That reminds me - are you on the IUSW email list? Someone was complaining about the way an Edinburgh sauna was treating its staff recently.