Music vs film

[lovingboth]

The other recent thought was when it comes to music, I look on in amazement at people buying new vinyl of old stuff. There were loads of reasons why CDs took off as a music format over vinyl, with about the only downside being that there wasn't so much room for the cover art. (Oh, and the cost, but that's now reversed, especially with second-hand where you can more or less guarantee that a CD that's not badly scratched will play perfectly.)

Somewhat cynically, I think the popularity of the 'includes link to MP3 download!!' stickers on such LPs shows how many of them are actually played rather than just used as ornaments.

But when it comes to film, I have spent a lot of time in cinemas, including many, many hours at the old National Film Theatre and the still much missed Scala in Kings Cross...

.. but now I have to be actively prodded to go. Live broadcasts, fine, but for 'film' it's a struggle and I really do not want to pay anything like the standard price.

I'm wondering how much the switch to digital projection has to do with this: do I miss the film noise of scratches and cuts but not the vinyl music noise of rumble and pops? Or is it that a £1 DVD played on a £30-something player with 5.1 sound plus a £199 TV is good enough?

Comments

[judiff]

I like the whole like cinema darkness and popcorn feeling (as long as it's not too flickery/strobey). But like DVDs from the library/charity shops are great for like brain candy for low spoon days

You can always be our "carer" if you want to see London filums for less money