lovingboth: (Default)
[personal profile] lovingboth
Where IDS has made a politically fatal mistake is in not calling for a leadership election himself a la John Major.

If he had done so, he'd have forced the slimy Michael Howard et al to either come out publicly and stand against him - and be seen by the membership as having been responsible for the mess - or be forced to make the calculation as to whether or not to support who ever was brave enough to stand.

If say David Davies did, Howard would have to hope that Davies got enough votes to topple IDS, but not enough to actually win himself. Tricky!

Now there's going to be a vote of confidence in which they'll both say in public how wonderful IDS is while voting 'no' in private. When - and I'm sure it will be when - IDS loses, they'll stand in the subsequent leadership election saying 'I regret that he lost, but now I am free to stand, I didn't cause this, vote for me.'

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-28 01:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] drdoug.livejournal.com
Reckon you're right about the likely course of events, but I don't think it was a certain thing last week that there would be enough votes to trigger a confidence vote. People were pretty startled by Major's call (I was gobsmacked meself), and while it did keep the leadership off the news agenda once it was over, it didn't exactly leave him as a powerful leader in control of the party.

My take is that IDS guessed that if he resigned to trigger an election, he might not win it convincingly enough to look like a leader the party could unite behind successfully. (Remember a Certain Other Tory Leader who left after failing to win a leadership election with a big enough margin?) He bet that there was a better chance that Francis Maude and one or two others could be faced down than that he would win an election with sufficient margin. I think that was the best bet of a bad lot. Of course, now, in retrospect, it now looks like he was doomed all along with choices like that ... but I really don't want to say that!

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-28 02:47 pm (UTC)
ext_8176: (Default)
From: [identity profile] softfruit.livejournal.com
See also, "the Lib Dems winning Brent East was a tactical blunder that will cost them many seats at the next election"

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-29 02:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] valkyriekaren.livejournal.com
If David Davies did defeat IDS... no, sorry, too much tongue-twister potential...

Profile

lovingboth: (Default)
Ian

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Active Entries

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags