lovingboth: (Default)
[personal profile] lovingboth
Three separate places are currently debating this one. What do you think?

[Poll #223691]

(no subject)

Date: 2003-12-22 06:51 am (UTC)
djm4: (Default)
From: [personal profile] djm4
The consent was conditional, though, and the conditions subsequently weren't met. I don't know the legal definition of rape well enough to comment, though. As to whether it's morally 'rape', that would depend on an agreed moral defintion of 'rape' the existence of which I'm not aware of. It is in the same moral ball-park, to my mind.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-12-22 07:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] uran.livejournal.com
Agreed.
If it were a simple case of non-payment of services, that would be to say that prostitutes only provide services and nothing more. If that's the case, why are they so frowned upon as a whole? Something more is going on, or maybe pop will eat itself. It's too late to be having this discussion with myself :)

(no subject)

Date: 2003-12-22 07:29 am (UTC)
cryx: me showing off hair done by a stylist from paris (Default)
From: [personal profile] cryx
Tis a tricky one to be sure!

What about the case of the girl who is waiting till marriage, but decided to sleep with her fiance as they were going to get married, so that would be 'alright'. does it then become rape a year down the line when he decideds that he doesn't want to marry her?

if so, would it still be the case if she now thought waiting till marriage was a mugs game? The conditions of the initial act would still be broken.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-12-23 01:42 am (UTC)
cryx: me showing off hair done by a stylist from paris (Default)
From: [personal profile] cryx
wow. he really was desperate to get laid!

Profile

lovingboth: (Default)
Ian

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
6 789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Active Entries

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags