lovingboth: (Default)
[personal profile] lovingboth
Three separate places are currently debating this one. What do you think?

[Poll #223691]

(no subject)

Date: 2003-12-22 07:22 am (UTC)
cryx: me showing off hair done by a stylist from paris (Default)
From: [personal profile] cryx
So you'd say that when a prostitute has sex with someone, it's merely a physical transaction and she/he's not sharing a part of his/her self at the time and it is not at all personal?

No, not at all actually, but i do feel the crux of rape is the consentuality of the act.

i see your point, but i would define rape as someone being forced into an act which is non consentual at the time of the act.

If you change your mind later about the consentuality i don't think that can be counted as rape. And if it was said that you could change your mind later on, that would set quite a dangerous precident.

That being said i would definitely say not paying would be a crime, but i really don't feel that it could be classed under the crime of 'rape'.

I feel a morally similar situation would be of an artist who gives someone their life's work, with the expectaition of being paid, only for the person to run off with it. Psychologically damaging, certainly.

Profile

lovingboth: (Default)
Ian

September 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
2122 2324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags