lovingboth: (Default)
[personal profile] lovingboth
Three separate places are currently debating this one. What do you think?

[Poll #223691]

(no subject)

Date: 2003-12-22 07:22 am (UTC)
cryx: me showing off hair done by a stylist from paris (Default)
From: [personal profile] cryx
So you'd say that when a prostitute has sex with someone, it's merely a physical transaction and she/he's not sharing a part of his/her self at the time and it is not at all personal?

No, not at all actually, but i do feel the crux of rape is the consentuality of the act.

i see your point, but i would define rape as someone being forced into an act which is non consentual at the time of the act.

If you change your mind later about the consentuality i don't think that can be counted as rape. And if it was said that you could change your mind later on, that would set quite a dangerous precident.

That being said i would definitely say not paying would be a crime, but i really don't feel that it could be classed under the crime of 'rape'.

I feel a morally similar situation would be of an artist who gives someone their life's work, with the expectaition of being paid, only for the person to run off with it. Psychologically damaging, certainly.

Profile

lovingboth: (Default)
Ian

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
6 789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Active Entries

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags