why is that annoying? whats annoying is that she was on there in the first place. posting pictures of a minor w/out her knowledge and detailing her sexual exploits is so beyond wrong.
I think it's annoying that someone had to go through all the entries to find something like that in order to get the hosts to pull the plug.
Rather than them going 'Ooops, sorry, this is appallingly offensive (and also exposes us to enormous libel damages!) Thanks for pointing it out, we'll pull the plug' the instant it was brought to their attention, for example...
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
baggyeyes
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2004-02-02 09:24 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2004-02-03 02:44 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2004-02-03 06:03 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2004-02-03 07:04 am (UTC)Rather than them going 'Ooops, sorry, this is appallingly offensive (and also exposes us to enormous libel damages!) Thanks for pointing it out, we'll pull the plug' the instant it was brought to their attention, for example...
(Oh, having written something about it, I found it interesting to compare and contrast some escort's feelings on the subject of reviews.)
Re:
Date: 2004-02-03 08:00 am (UTC)though i agree that its sucks that it takes such an extreme to get them to realize that it is wrong.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-02-03 02:28 am (UTC)or alternatively, it's probably *not* a good idea to libel your ex online if she happens to be a lawyer!!!
That site did sound rather grim though!