Ian (
lovingboth) wrote2005-07-12 08:16 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
When I made the predictions
I didn't include one - the number of American tourists coming to London will drop - because it was so obvious.
(When the US bombed Libya because of state-sponsored terrorism (ironically hitting the French embassy, given their sinking of the Rainbow Warrior and murder of one of its crew) they used bases in the UK. American tourism dropped because of the possibility of retaliation for something they'd done.)
But I didn't expect the US to order its troops not to go within the M25.
"These colors never run"? They come inside when it looks like it might rain, more like...
(When the US bombed Libya because of state-sponsored terrorism (ironically hitting the French embassy, given their sinking of the Rainbow Warrior and murder of one of its crew) they used bases in the UK. American tourism dropped because of the possibility of retaliation for something they'd done.)
But I didn't expect the US to order its troops not to go within the M25.
"These colors never run"? They come inside when it looks like it might rain, more like...
no subject
In short: they are keeping any reasons for terrorist attacks to a minimum while an ongoing investigation by the security services is underway. Quite normal and its been covered before when the IRA was bombing london in the 70s and 80s.
no subject
There's a difference between saying 'let's not have an official attendence at that big event in London or have streams of service people in uniform there' and 'you must not go there'. Particularly when it becomes public.
no subject
the world
no subject
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4673987.stm