lovingboth: (Default)
Ian ([personal profile] lovingboth) wrote2009-04-19 02:34 pm
Entry tags:

An infinite number of correct answers

From a SATS key stage 2 (i.e. for 6-7 year olds) practice question...

[Poll #1386206]
barakta: (Default)

[personal profile] barakta 2009-04-19 01:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Bugger you've hidden the responses ;)

I specifically said I was only dealing in integers.

That's also quite hard for a KS2 child - they only really seem to have started multiplication tables by then. I'm not sure I could have done that at 6 or 7 cos we didn't do tables properly till I was about 8 when I crunched through them rapidly and got my stupid certificate out of the way.

[identity profile] ciphergoth.livejournal.com 2009-04-19 02:03 pm (UTC)(link)
If you said integers, did you consider answers like -6*-20?
barakta: (Default)

[personal profile] barakta 2009-04-19 02:04 pm (UTC)(link)
No, you got me on those.

[identity profile] ciphergoth.livejournal.com 2009-04-19 02:10 pm (UTC)(link)
A useful term here is [[natural number (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_number)]]

[identity profile] valkyriekaren.livejournal.com 2009-04-19 02:29 pm (UTC)(link)
I've never understood why minus numbers behave that way.

[identity profile] ciphergoth.livejournal.com 2009-04-19 02:37 pm (UTC)(link)
I'll show you next time we're in the same place. The short answer is: draw a graph of -2x against x and it should be clear!

[identity profile] valkyriekaren.livejournal.com 2009-04-19 05:18 pm (UTC)(link)
It's OK, I don't think I really need to know why. Multiplying minus numbers in my head isn't something I need to do regularly, anyway.
barakta: (Default)

[personal profile] barakta 2009-04-19 02:29 pm (UTC)(link)
I await your answers with interest.

I definitely want to see what the mathmos answered and see if my poor little brain can make sense of it without going *boom*.

[identity profile] ciphergoth.livejournal.com 2009-04-19 02:36 pm (UTC)(link)
I think I gave good answer :-)