lovingboth: (Default)
[personal profile] lovingboth
From a SATS key stage 2 (i.e. for 6-7 year olds) practice question...

[Poll #1386206]

(no subject)

Date: 2009-04-19 02:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ciphergoth.livejournal.com
If you said integers, did you consider answers like -6*-20?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-04-19 02:04 pm (UTC)
barakta: (Default)
From: [personal profile] barakta
No, you got me on those.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-04-19 02:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ciphergoth.livejournal.com
A useful term here is [[natural number (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_number)]]

(no subject)

Date: 2009-04-19 02:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] valkyriekaren.livejournal.com
I've never understood why minus numbers behave that way.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-04-19 02:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ciphergoth.livejournal.com
I'll show you next time we're in the same place. The short answer is: draw a graph of -2x against x and it should be clear!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-04-19 05:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] valkyriekaren.livejournal.com
It's OK, I don't think I really need to know why. Multiplying minus numbers in my head isn't something I need to do regularly, anyway.

Profile

lovingboth: (Default)
Ian

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
6 789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Active Entries

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags