Homo- and biphobia are a big reason why the majority of HIV infections in the UK are still of gay and bisexual men.
I'm not sure I can parse that sentence. The writer seems to think that since gay and bi-men are/have been the worst hit by AIDS, that they should be acknowledged somehow. Which I can see. But how does the above sentence make sense? Are gay and bi-men being infected against their will via hate crimes?
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
baggyeyes
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2010-12-01 03:30 pm (UTC)I'm not sure I can parse that sentence. The writer seems to think that since gay and bi-men are/have been the worst hit by AIDS, that they should be acknowledged somehow. Which I can see. But how does the above sentence make sense? Are gay and bi-men being infected against their will via hate crimes?